Conditions in Denmark for Press Freedom is no better than in a Dictatorship: 
 
Freedom Of Speech Is Not For Everyone In The State Of Denmark - Widespread Censorship In Danish Press...
 
By Britt Bartenbach
Copyright: NPInews, Copenhagen
(The content of this article may not be used or published in any form without the express permission from NPInews)
 
Who would have thought that the 'Champion for Free Speech and Free Press', the Danish Prime Minister Mr. Anders Fogh Rasmussen, was in total control of the Danish press and holding the press in an iron grip?
 
As it happens the PM is also Minister for the Press, and during the Fogh Government Denmark has experienced a bloody massacre on free speech. This is particularly notable in the former wide variety of local grassroot and talk radios across the country. After seven years with the Fogh control freak Government only a handful of these radios are still alive, and of those just two or three dare to practise Fogh's motto: Freedom of Speech - the rest are playing it safe and broadcasting 'ass-licking' local government and Mayor announcements and non-stop music.
 
Critical Voices
Not the PM's Cup of Tea
Critical or dissident voices in the local media are not the PM's and Press Minister Fogh's cup of tea, and he makes sure that his state controlled institution The Press Committee, headed by a Supreme Court judge, clamps down on those local radio stations which are not willing to be gagged by the Central State Control.
 
If the measures to subdue the local radio station, or to stop a specific news item or a controversial story revealing unpleasant facts, are not working, then the method is to get loyal henchmen - or socalled 'willing idiots' - acting in the shape of violated citizens, to shower the State's Press Committee with fake and provocated complaints.
 
In order to control the non-commercial local talk radios the Fogh Government has introduced legislation that makes it possible to withdraw the broadcasting licence to a 'sinful' local radio station who has received repeated complaints about its journalism which the Press Committee has found valid.
 
Harsh State Measures Control
Local Radio and Television
With this weapon in hand the state controlled Radio and Television Board makes good use of the fake complaints which means that they can withdraw all state subsidies to the misbehaving local radio station. The state subsidy is barely covering the actual costs of running a radio station and does not cover wages to the people manning the station who are unpaid for the time and the effort they put in, and the State have introduced outrageous control measures, not only as concerns the monies but also warns it will control all programmes and their content at the end of a full year.
 
Complaints to the Minister of the Press, the PM Fogh Rasmussen, are redistributed to the Minister for Culture and Sport, the neo-conservative sports enthusiast Brian Mikkelsen, who is in charge of the broadcasting licences and state subsidies, and this minister says he is unable to interfere with a final administrative decision from the Radio and Television Board - a decision which is in breach with the national legislation but also with the UN's and the European Human Rights Conventions on Freedom of the Press and Freedom of Expression. 
 
Prescription to
Kill a Radio Station
The only option remaining for the targetet local radio station is to take out legal proceedings and have the case dealt with in court. However, this quickly proves to be a dead end as the radio station has exhausted its monetary funding, the leading persons of the radio station are penniless after having spent their last financial resources on the continued running of the station, and no Danish lawyer would venture to take on such a case against the State and the PM Mr. Fogh Rasmussen.
 
The prescription to 'kill a radio station' has been made an example with the silencing of the long-running and popular talk radio Copenhagen Radio Frederiksberg Journal who was shut down by state censorship in 2007 after seventeen years on air and after having been known for its breaking news and pioneering journalistic focus on all the shadowy ills in the Danish society.
 
Many attempts had been made through the years to threaten or to lure the fiercely independent and politically neutral Radio Frederiksberg Journal to either choose a less honest and direct journalistic style, and the station had even a few years ago been quaranteened for a few months which caused a storm of protests from the listeners until the station was on air again.
 
Free Speech Under
Boot of Big Brother
The last couple of years, however, such protests have almost vanished since the Danes have become more subdued and are reluctant to give their names to anything which may put them in danger of being seen as dissidents by Big Brother, and many fear that any criticism could result in the withdrawal of social benefits or other state or council related benefits available to the citizens in the Welfare State. Or they simply worry that the State may target their children or grandchildren for forcible removal from their homes. After all, 14,000 children are permanently living outside their homes in Denmark either at institutions or in foster care families. 
 
Many other methods of the more 'subtle' kind had been used in the years prior to the final closure had been used to curb the Radio Frederiksberg Journal such as an unprecedented smear campaign on the internet and damage control against the radio station are just some of the remedies used by the authorities who have not stopped at inventing false accusations against the leading figures of the radio station.
 
 
 
The Radio Frederiksberg Journal was known for its investigative and pioneering journalism free of political or religious bias and for their exposure of delicate matters hidden in the shadows from the time of the Nazi occupation of Denmark during WW2 when the Danish police top collaborated with the Gestapo and Danish politicians saw their advantage in working hand-in-hand with Nazi Germany.
 
In the land of the 'Free Speech and Freedom of the Press' the Danish mainstream media have been busy playing along with the fabricated damage control, but the 'free press' never wrote a line or mentioned a word about the state closure of the journalistic local talk radio - methods which sends shivers down one's spine in reminders of the former police state DDR on the eastern side of the old Berlin Wall. That is the picture of State Control in the Free and Democratic Denmark, and it is not the same picture which is reflected in the media, neither in Denmark nor in the international media.
 
Danes Said No
To Remote EC Control
In the 1990's it was the question of the increasing powers of the Bureaucrats in the European Union which divided the people of Denmark. And when the Danes spited their political and industrial leaders by voting 'No' to Bigger Brother EC's treaties, and later on even dared to reject the Euro in favour of the Danish national Krone, the small Scandinavian Kingdom became a symbol of 'David who dared to confront Goliath'.
 
The Danes' No to Remote Control Government from Brussels made headlines all over the world, and the populations of the other European States looked with envy on the Danes who were among the very few of the EC population who were given the opportunity to cast their vote and decide the future of their nation in a referendum.  
 
For decades after the end of World War 2 Denmark had the reputation of being a progressive nation - a model of the almost perfect Welfare State and always in the front when it came to humanitarian world issues and universal human rights.
 
Glory Box
Starting to Fade
In 2006, and again in 2008, Denmark's glory box is starting to fade and the icing of the cake is melting. Again Denmark is on everybody's lips, and again the Danes are divided. This time the headlines are not reflecting admiration, nor are the reactions throughout the world full of praise.
 
The cartoons illustrating the Prophet Muhammed, which were printed by the neo-conservative newspaper Jyllands-Posten, were meant as a provocation, and - according to some analysts - were created to test the reaction in the Muslim community in Denmark.
 
Perhaps noone expected the provocation to backfire with such verocity and that this would be echoed the world over.
 
Little known is the fact, which was uncovered in a brief news flash two years ago on Danish State Radio but was quickly buried by the State censorship, that the father-in-law of the man behind the idea, Cultural Editor Flemming Rose, is a retired high-ranking Russian KGB officer.
 
 
 
Did intelligence sources with an unknown agenda whisper ideas into the ear of the editor with the intent to let the already Muslim hostile Danish nation be the testing ground for the anticipated clash of culture and religion, between East and West, the Christian World and the Muslim World? 
 
We may never know what lies behind this experiment which was said to put the Freedom of Speech to the test, not only in Denmark, but worldwide. However, there is no doubt that there was a greater and a hidden agenda behind the test, and to believe that Flemming Rose got the 'bright' idea himself is ludicrous.
 
In a recent interview Flemming Rose said that the cartoons and the accompanying text from the start was a 'political project with the purpose of removing the legislation covering defamatory and slanderous expressions', and in lieu of the present political climate in Denmark that project seems to be overriding concern of the Danish parliamentarians and the press, and noone seems to realise that the cost of this project will be so high that it is totally out of proportion to the importance of the project.
 
During the height of the Cartoon Crisis in 2006 the face of the Danish Prime Minister, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, appeared on all national and international news programmes, and suddenly Denmark became known even in the most remote village on Planet Earth.
 
PM's Front as 'Champion
of Democracy and Liberty'
He stood up as the Champion of Democracy and Liberty and as the Defender of the Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press, a freedom which is not to be touched or discussed no matter what. It was as if the entire 'Civilised and Democratized' world's survival was at stake, and the newspaper's free choice to print the cartoons, which insulted the feelings of the world's 1,3 billion Muslim population, was a lot more important than apologizing for bad taste and bad manners.
 
Respect and consideration for other people's feelings and dignity were not part of the PM's vocabulary as he raised the banner of Free Speech and Freedom of the Press as a Mantra which is seen as a 'holy cow' and a right with which neither he nor the State could under any circumstances interfere.
 
Most freedom loving people would applaud and agree that it is a privilege to live in a country which allows civil liberties such as Free Speech, and two-thirds of the world's population would give their lives not to live in a Police State or in a Dictatorship.
 
However, the Danish PM forgot to mention that with the privilege of Free Speech comes responsibility on the part of the individual as well as on the part of the press. Denmark even has a specific law which lays down the rules for these responsibilities. And the law quite clearly specifies that insults against other people's race, ethnic or cultural background are a violation of these people's rights and that such violations are punishable under the Criminal Code.
 
Yet the State's institution, the Danish Press Committee headed by a Supreme Court judge, aquitted the newspaper and the cartoons, and so did the Danish courts.
 
Cartoons Diverted
Attention From Domestic Ills
From being a matter of public debate and a legal question, the cartoon case became a Political Issue, and the overriding order of the day under the holy banner of the inviolable Freedom of Speech which may easily leave the gates wide open for uncontrollable hate and smear campaigns, out of control damage control and mud throwing with the only purpose of diverting the focus away from the real and important issues affecting the day-to-day lives of all citizens.
 
The Danish PM made certain to wave the banner and cleverly took advantage of the situation and the high emotions in the Danish society by diverting the nation's attention away from serious flaws in his government's running of domestic affairs.
 
All focus in Denmark was on the Cartoon Crisis, the burning of the Danish flag in the streets of the Muslim world, the burning of Danish embassies and the boycott of Danish goods, and in the face of all this hostility the PM managed to stir up a feeling of national unity, and an 'Us against Them' kind of logic.
 
Unlimited Devotion
to George W. Bush
He scored some high points for 'standing up for the special Danish version of Freedom of Speech', particularly with the masses who are easy to manipulate when they are feeling threatened, and with those who want Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Press to stand above all other considerations at all times and without any responsibilities or limitations.
 
The other part of the Danes, who are embarrased by the cartoon provocation and who see the issue as a case of bad behaviour, find it difficult to be heard, and those who voiced their opinion are ridiculed or blacklisted.
 
Prime Minister Fogh Rasmussen, who has just aired his unlimited admiration for the US President George W. Bush during his visit at Bush's private ranch in Crawford, Texas, where he unashamedly aired his devotion to Bush as the 'Champion for the Environment' - in spite of the fact that the Bush administration for years refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol - and a great 'Champion for Democracy and Peace', has played his cards well and stands to be appointed to an elevated position as either the next Secretary General of NATO or the first President of the European Community.
 
Professional Spin
Keeps the PM in Power
At home in the Danish press, Mr. Fogh Rasmussen has very little problems with criticism since criticism directed at him and his leadership is so scarce and so easy to quell that his many successive spin doctors have no trouble in turning it to Mr. Fogh's and his Government's advantage. Fogh's public image has become that of the infallible 'Father of the Nation' who makes wise, careful and rational choices on behalf of his country, and it has become bad taste in the Danish press and even in the opposition to question the PM's choices. 
 
Forgotten is the fact that Mr. Fogh Rasmussen was forced to step down as Minister for Taxation in the Conservative-Liberal coalition Government back in the mid 1980's because of fraudulent bookkeeping practices in his ministry, a practice which had cost Danish private business owners and fishermen approx. 50 billion kroner of illegally collected taxes, and a case which was the Danish State lost in 1994 in the EC court who condemned. The Danish State was forced to reimburse the business owners, but the reimbursements were peanuts compared to the amount collected by the State. By that time Mr. Fogh Rasmussen's days as Minister for Taxation had long since come to an abrupt end, but the example illustrates how quickly the voters forget a parliamentarian's past trespasses.
 
PM Managed
to Stage a Come Back
Never the less Mr. Fogh Rasmussen managed to stage a come back and become the leader of the Liberal Party which won a landslide election back in 2001 and formed a coalition government with the Conservative Party. For the third time in succession, he has recently won another election and is more strengthened than before with his neo-conservative support party The People's Party who do not tolerate any criticism - nor do they tolerate anything else since they wage a 'Zero Tolerance' war - and make no attempts to hide their hatred of Islam or their general fear of the Muslim World. 
 
At least for the time being the Danes' attention has been directed away from the ills of the Danish state of affairs, such as the growing gap between rich and poor, the increase in families living below the poverty line, rising living costs and high energy taxes, drastic welfare cuts, a national health system and educational system in shambles and the Danish Government's unpopular and costly engagement in the War on Terror in Iraq and in Afghanistan.
 
Local Talk Radio Silenced
For Independent Journalism
When the Danish PM spoke on all the television channels, he forgot to mention that the Danish Freedom of Speech only applies to those who are in line with his power elite and the opinions expressed by the mainstream media. Small and independent media and journalists at non-commercial local and regional radio stations, which are not the run-of-the-mill 'juke box radios', are targeted as never before.
 
They have felt the whip of "Big Daddy", the nickname of the PM whispered timidly by journalists who freeze in awe in the presence of George W. Bush's own buddy, Mr. Fogh Rasmussen, when he enters the press room at the Prime Minister's Department to hold his weekly address to the Nation and to the press.
 
In the midst of the turmoil of the cartoon crisis the outcry of the closing of the local radio station, the Radio Frederiksberg Journal, drowned in the noise.
 
The final death blow to the Radio Station came in the form of two manipulated and fake programmes on the State National Television channel DR2 in the programme "The Eleventh Hour" in which the television host, Mads Brügger, played a major role in a well-planned quest to slander the leading persons from the Radio Frederiksberg Journal and to scandalize their newly published non-fiction book about an unsolved postwar murder case which has sent shock waves through political, police and intelligence circles in Denmark.
 
Silenced with
One Day's Notice
In spite of the State withdrawing the regular state subdidy given to all non-commercial radio stations, the Radio Frederiksberg Journal managed to run for two years on voluntary manpower and finansing until it was silenced with one day's notice by the State censorship and an administrative decision from the staterun Radio and Television Committee.
 
Though the Radio Frederiksberg Journal had ample documentation and witness accounts to substantiate its stories, and the Law regulating the press was not violated, the decision to shut down the radio station was final and could not be appealed to higher authority. For the radio station to have the decision dealt with in a court of law is risky business since it is quite unusual for the legal system in Denmark to make a verdict against the authorities and especially against the State itself. In any case in would be difficult to raise funding for a court case since the radio station is bankrupt and thus cannot afford to hire a lawyer to take out legal proceedings.
 
In the face of what happened in the case of the Radio Frederiksberg Journal, many Danes are doubting the Danish Prime Minister's sincerety in his glorification of Denmark's uncompromising fight for Freedom of Speech and for the Freedom of the Press...  
 
END